Binance Coin price analysis: BNB price consolidating below $30

While Bitcoin Cash saw a hell of a day on the other hand when the currency hit the lowest and highest point of two weeks on the same day.

The consolidation is evident in the Binance Coin price analysis charts since the currency is stagnant at twenty-nine dollars ($29) moving in the small margin of one.

The ERC 20 token backed by one of the largest cryptocurrency exchanges in the world Binance the cryptocurrency has been performing well since inception.

Binance Coin price analysis: BNB price consolidating below $30 2Binance coin price chart by Trading View

As evident in the chart, the price is jumping by 0.1 to 0.4, however, it is unable to break past the key resistance point at thirty ($30).

Binance Coin price analysis prediction

A consolidation period seems to be afoot Binance Coin’s future. Binance Coin (BNB) left its daily trend behind on August 8 but the fifty days (50) moving average (MA) was still not crossed by BNB; hence, it stayed in the red zone.

The twenty (20) day exponential moving average (EMA); bullish- along with the relative strength index (RSI) stationed at the 50 point mark, have nothing but consolidation in store for the cryptocurrency.

Binance Coin price analysis: BNB price consolidating below $30 3Binance Coin price chart by Trading View

The consolidation region will be enclosed between twenty-four ($24.1709) dollars and on the higher side, at thirty-two ($32.50) dollars.

If things go bullish, after the consolidation period ends, then BNB price can be expected to receive support on the eighteen dollar mark ($18.30). Previous analysis dictates that BNB will be on an all-time high after it breaks off from the consolidation.

While Bitcoin Cash saw a hell of a day on the other hand when the currency hit the lowest and highest point of two weeks on the same day.


Related Posts:

  • No Related Posts

China’s official digital currency is nearly ready

As much as China frowns on cryptocurrency, it’s happy to introduce its own form of virtual cash. The People’s Bank of China has revealed that its digital …

It’ll rely on a two-tier split, with the People’s Bank on top and commercial banks below, ostensibly to help deal with the sheer size of China’s economy and population. Also, it won’t rely entirely on the blockchain that forms the backbone of cryptocurrencies. It just couldn’t deliver the throughput needed for retail, Changchun said.

There’s no mention of just when the currency would be ready.

China does have a motivation to roll out the monetary format sooner than later. The nation has reportedly argued that cryptocurrency creates disorder, with speculators selling off regular currency and buying up the virtual kind. This new approach might create stability. It’s also no shock that the Chinese government would want a digital currency system it could control. Officials have spent years trying to increase China’s independence from foreign tech, and this would be the next logical step.

Related Posts:

  • No Related Posts

Apple, Citi, JPMorgan, BofA are Against Bitcoin Purchases

Apple, Citi, JPMorgan, BofA are Against Bitcoin Purchases … Also, Gemini cryptocurrency exchange only accepts clients to fund their accounts via …
Aug 10, 2019 at 12:26 // News

Coin Idol

 Apple rolled out a new card providing customers 3% cash-back (discount) on products and services bought directly from Apple.

Several credit card firms have started forbidding Bitcoin and cryptocurrency purchases with various decent reasons. This very week, Apple Inc. in collaboration with two American multinationals financial services firms Mastercard Incorporated and Goldman Sachs Group, officially rolled out a new card providing customers 3% cash-back (discount) on products and services bought directly from Apple, and 2% discount on any products bought using Apple Pay – Apple’s electronic wallet service – and 1% on other related transactions.

Even though Apple Card has no yearly fees or other related transaction fees, it carries some fine print. Particularly, Apple’s credit card may not be in any way applied for cash advances or equivalents, and this ban takes account of cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin (BTC), as revealed by the customer agreement published on Goldman Sachs’ official website.

Security First

In banning card purchases of digital currencies, Apple is being supported by other issuers and providers of credit cards including Citigroup Inc. based in New York City, JPMorgan Chase & Co. with its headquarters in NY, Bank of America (BofA) based in North Carolina and Capital One Financial Corporation based in Virginia. Credit card issuers seemingly don’t view cryptocurrencies including Bitcoin as digital gold, or a durable investment, just as a wide number of cryptoasset collectors do.

From February last year, all these four multinational financial services giants have prohibited their clients from purchasing cryptocurrencies including BTC using their cards on major virtual asset exchanges such as Coinbase. Another American financial services firm based in California Wells Fargo & Company, also barred its customers from buying digital assets using their credit cards since June last year. Also, Gemini cryptocurrency exchange only accepts clients to fund their accounts via bank, wire transfers or digital currency deposits.

The attempt of financial institutions to ban customers from making purchases using cryptocurrency may be attributed to security matters and the volatile nature of Bitcoin. Credit cards further have the risk of default. In addition, several credit card firms have tried to stop customers from participating in gambling and buying stocks in order to prevent compulsive behaviors that could cause financial disintegration.

Related Posts:

  • No Related Posts

Digital Yuan: Weapon in US Trade War or Attempt to Manipulate Bitcoin?

After a short stay in the red zone, Bitcoin (BTC) has recovered toward … to the U.S. dollar, such as Gemini Dollar (GUSD) and Paxos Standard (PAX).

After a short stay in the red zone, Bitcoin (BTC) has recovered toward $12,000, with traders turning bullish as ever. Experts call the United States-China trade war a key reason for the main cryptocurrency’s price fluctuations. Fuel to the fire has been added by the recent announcement by the People’s Bank of China (PBoC) of plans to get ahead of the U.S. and Facebook’s Libra by issuing a national cryptocurrency.

Chinese government is set to digitize yuan, challenge U.S. and Libra

As Cointelegraph reported, the PBoC plans to focus on developing its own legal digital currency. On Aug. 2, during a video conference devoted to discussing financial tasks for the second half of 2019, heads of financial and economic institutes in China touched upon the topic of cryptocurrencies. The country’s central bank announced its intention to accelerate the development of its own digital currency and also confirmed its plans to allocate more resources to the implementation of this task.

It is notable that the decision of the Chinese bank to intensify the creation of a national cryptocurrency was preceded by the hotly debated development of the Libra coin. Initiated by Facebook in 2019, the project is now actively being lobbied for in the U.S. government, but without any results so far.

Related: US Congress on Libra Overview: Trust, Privacy and Genocide Accusations

In July, Wang Xin, director of the PBoC Research Bureau, said that, with the development of the Libra cryptocurrency project, the People’s Bank of China should accelerate the growth of its own digital currency, which it has been working on over the past few years. Wang believes that the risks Libra bears for the traditional financial system will force regulators to devote many more resources and forces to develop its digital currency. Wang asked:

“If [Libra] is widely used for payments — cross-border payments in particular — would it be able to function like money and accordingly have a large influence on monetary policy, financial stability, and the international monetary system?”

In particular, China is concerned about which currencies Libra will be tied to and what role the U.S. dollar will play in this project. Wang said:

“If the digital currency is closely associated with the US dollar, it could create a scenario under which sovereign currencies would coexist with US dollar-centric digital currencies. But there would be in essence one boss, that is the US dollar and the United States. If so, it would bring a series of economic, financial and even international political consequences.”

Former PBoC Chairman Zhou Xiaochuan also believes that the concept of a global digital currency introduced by Facebook that can be exchanged into fiat money threatens existing cross-border payment systems and could weaken the position of national currencies, which he spoke about at a conference in Beijing, as reported by the South China Morning Post.

According to Zhou, Chinese authorities need to strengthen the national currency and consider the Hong Kong model to create a digital renminbi, which involves issuing money through commercial enterprises under the supervision of the central bank. Some analysts have already expressed the belief that technology giants Alibaba and Tencent may be assigned such a task. Large corporations in the country appear to be supportive of the ideas coming from government ​​members, as Huawei CEO Ren Zhengfei commented:

“China can just issue our own version of Libra. Why should we wait for others to do it? The power of a country is always stronger than that of an Internet company.”

Stablecoin to support the local economy

A future national cryptocurrency may be issued in the form of a stablecoin tied to the yuan (also called the renminbi). Researchers at the PBoC published a review of recent initiatives in this area back in October last year. Most of the coins discussed in the material are pegged to the U.S. dollar, such as Gemini Dollar (GUSD) and Paxos Standard (PAX). The researchers are convinced that the development of cryptocurrencies tied to USD strengthens the role of the dollar in the global monetary system, while also having a negative impact on other fiat currencies. According to the researchers:

“If the stablecoins tied to the U.S. dollar end up being widely recognized by the market and prove their applicability in the real economy, we will have to redouble our research efforts in this direction, as well as in studying the relevant experience. This is necessary to support local institutions and issue stablecoins tied to the renminbi.”

At the same time, the authors note that stablecoins still have a long way to go before the financial system begins to feel any significant influence from new assets. Star Xu, the founder of cryptocurrency exchange OKCoin, expressed a similar point of view in his post on Weibo, writing: “The dollar-pegged #stablecoin regulated by the US government will strengthen the penetration of the US dollar 100 fold.”

Bitcoin is growing due to the yuan’s rate falling

Analysts have drawn parallels between the declining rate of the yuan and Bitcoin’s growth. The price of the preeminent digital currency rose sharply the very moment when the Chinese currency fell by 7% to an 11-year low. On Aug. 5, Bitcoin’s price surged to $11,786, with the daily increase amounting to an 11% gain.

Correlation between yuan’s fall and Bitcoin’s surge

U.S. President Donald Trumpalleged on Twitter that the Chinese government is manipulating the price of the renminbi:

“China dropped the price of their currency to an almost a historic low. It’s called ‘currency manipulation.’ Are you listening Federal Reserve? This is a major violation which will greatly weaken China over time!”

As financial analysts suggest, the renminbi declined due to investors’ concerns about a new round of escalation in the trade war between China and the U.S. This happened a few days after Trump introduced additional tariffs on goods imported from China. Now that U.S. products could become more expensive for Chinese consumers, a lower exchange rate might adversely affect U.S. exporters. The prices of U.S. stock futures have already declined, while the cryptocurrency market has demonstrated the opposite tendency.

Some analysts have postulated that the reason for this dynamic could be because Chinese investors use Bitcoin as a means of saving money. Simon Peters, an analyst at trading platform eToro, suggested that Chinese investors could want to diversify as the yuan fell. According to Peters:

“Given that Chinese investors make up a large proportion of crypto investors, there’s a strong possibility some are backing bitcoin’s chances against the yuan.”

However, Peter Schiff, an economist and CEO of brokerage company Euro Pacific Capital, rejected this explanation, claiming it was more about speculation rather than about real need:

“CNBC is trying its best to dupe its audience into buying Bitcoin. Despite gold being a much larger market, CNBC devotes far more airtime to Bitcoin. The Chinese aren’t buying Bitcoin as a safe haven. Speculators are buying, betting that the Chinese will buy it as a safe haven!”

The internet says…

An ambiguous statement made by the PBoC regarding the creation of a national cryptocurrency has sparked intense discussion around the world. Several points of view, primarily negative, have appeared on the internet in response. Some users suggested that both the U.S. and China need cryptocurrency to strengthen control over their citizens. Crypto enthusiast Richard Heart opined:

“Nations want more control over their cirizens. Nothing new…or good.”

And some even suggested that the confrontation between China and the U.S. in the cryptocurrency field could lead to a world war.

Place your bets

How soon Chinese residents will be able to see — and most importantly use — the local digital cryptocurrency is still unknown, as it may take years to implement such an idea. The full process may require the development of a regulatory framework, instruments of taxation and regulation, as well as creating special entities and hiring specialists who will work with cryptocurrency.

Previously, attempts to create a national cryptocurrency have already been undertaken by countries such as Iran, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Russia, Estonia and Venezuela. The South American country allegedly raised $1 billion during the presale of the supposedly oil-backed cryptocurrency Petro, and Venezuelan banks began to display the citizens’ account balance in the new currency. This year, Venezuela intends to make Petro OPEC’s main digital currency, according to Oil Minister Manuel Quevedo.

Related: Venezuelan Petro Against US Sanctions: History and Use of the Crypto

In regard to China, such an initiative has been discussed since January of 2016, when representatives of the PBoC announced the plans outlining their desire to create the country’s own digital currency as soon as possible. At the same time, the Chinese central bank also clearly articulated the advantages of cryptocurrencies over traditional money:

“Digital currencies are much cheaper in circulation than traditional fiat money, promote trade, increase transaction transparency and reduce the risks of money laundering and tax evasion. The use of digital currency will help build a new financial infrastructure, strengthen the payment system in China, increase the efficiency of mutual settlements and accelerate the modernization of the economy.”

Notably, the PBoC has been following the development of the digital currency market for a long time, with an appropriate research group created back in 2014. And since 2015, the Chinese government has been actively studying the regulatory experience of other countries in order to prepare an appropriate regulatory framework.

Evolution of PBoC's relations with cryptocurrencies

It is noteworthy that in a report published on the PBoC’s official website, the word “Bitcoin” is not mentioned even once, although China is one of the top players in the crypto industry. The principles and technologies on the basis of which it is planned to create a state digital currency are also not explained.

At the same time, blockchain technology is mentioned only once as one of the iconic phenomena in the information technology development. However, the general context of the statements suggests that the future digital currency will have much in common with Bitcoin — at least, from a technical point of view.

Wang noted that the PBoC was one of the first central banks to start exploring the possibility of creating its own digital currency, but research experience alone is not enough. Wang said, “We had an early start […] but lots of work is needed to consolidate our lead.” He also confirmed that the central bank has already received approval from Chinese authorities to create its own digital currency, though it is not yet known at which stage its development is currently at. Huang Yiping, a Beijing University professor and the chairman of the research initiative, said that China is ahead of the U.S. in promoting digital finance. He continued:

“It remains unclear if Libra will succeed […] but the concept won’t disappear. But it has sent a warning to China that its lead [in digital finance] is not a sure thing.”

However, in an interview with Cointelegraph, one of the senior PBoC representatives — who wished to remain anonymous — said that the implementation of such a fundamental project may not do without risks, continuing:

“Digital currency is a sphere very important to look at in the future. The turbulence caused by the Chinese-American trade war and the negative implications of it will last for a long time. Under these circumstances, we will have to monitor the development of digital assets since it brings both risks and opportunities. I believe that China will create its digital currency one day.”

Related Posts:

  • No Related Posts

Hype or the future of insurance?

Likewise, insurance policies on a smart contract through a blockchain could revolutionize the way policy wording is developed, distributed and …
Hype or the future of insurance?

IBC caught up with Gallagher Canada’s Mark Morency to find out what they really mean for the insurance industry.

IBC: How have insurers responded to blockchain and cryptocurrency clients?

Mark Morency:
With any emerging technology, insurers struggle to underwrite it because of its limited track record. Some insurers are open to blockchain; however, there are only a select few that will consider cryptocurrency clients. Blockchain is the engine for cryptocurrency, along with other security applications, so not all blockchain companies are a cryptocurrency risk, but that’s not always clear for insurers. There is a large client base that specializes in specific blockchain applications, including aspects of cryptocurrency, so when working with insurers, we work hard to understand the client’s business and differentiate their value proposition. I’ve spent a lot of time speaking with insurers to establish the credibility of these clients.

IBC: Will blockchain or cryptocurrency affect the insurance industry?

In any industry where identity management, trust between counterparties and fraud prevention are required, blockchain is a tool that can potentially resolve these issues. These are all characteristics that are important for insurance. For example, both claims and policy issuance can be significantly improved; if you look at the way proof of claim and forensic accounting occur after an event, it can be very time-consuming and expensive. Blockchain solutions can remove much of the reconciliation requirements, turning claims management into an almost instantaneous process. Likewise, insurance policies on a smart contract through a blockchain could revolutionize the way policy wording is developed, distributed and understood.

Cryptocurrency is a means of exchange that’s not necessarily being used on a large scale. If you look at North America, especially in the US, users of the currency and the SEC have treated it as an investment product, which is very different than how it is being treated in some other countries. It is better understood as a means of exchange or form of liquidity. Cryptocurrency can be thought of as internet-enabled cash. There’s a lot depending on regulation as to how cryptocurrency will find its place in the world. At this point, it is too early to say if it will have any meaningful role in insurance.

IBC: How will blockchain and other technologies impact financial institutions in the years to come?

This is why financial services is such an exciting industry: The most interesting trends are both invention – that is, creation of new technologies – and innovation, or creating new ways of using technology. For example, payment systems within banking – right now, a small fraction of the world’s payments happen on cryptocurrencies. While it is a new phenomenon that banks and insurers should monitor and be aware of, it is not yet a big disruptor in the payment system. Payment technology is already very advanced on the front end for consumers but hasn’t changed much for many years on the back end – behind the scenes. The payment industry is going to be impacted by both technology invention and innovation.

A growing number of transactions occur, and will occur, on smart contracts, and a growing amount of activity will be recorded on a blockchain. These are innovative uses of technology, not new technologies. While we focus on these technologies, the largest trends are happening right under our noses.

The trend to watch is who controls the payment system. In March, FIS made a deal to buy Worldpay, which alone processes more transactions than the largest American banks. Merchant processing was a business dominated by banks until they sold these divisions over the past few decades. Increasingly, the merchant processor is not a bank, yet the merchant processor owns that merchant relationship, and the payment processor, which is essentially the plumbing for the payment system, controls the client relationship. With the growth of e-commerce and blockchain eventually allowing for trusted transactions without an intermediary, this leaves the payment processors in a powerful position to take the client relationship away. I believe the long-term play between FIS and Worldpay is about having a global standard for multinational corporations to deal with, which will have a significant impact on the financial services industry.

New innovations are also supplemented by new tech such as AI, intelligent voice recognition and emulation, Big Data, and eventually quantum computing. The speed and scalability issues that innovations such as blockchain face today are going to become irrelevant because of new inventions. How many hours within financial institutions are spent on reconciliation, answering calls or fraud detection? All of these activities can be better done by tech that exists today and is coming to financial institutions in the very near future.

As these technologies evolve, financial institution companies are implementing them, and directors and officers have to consider the impact on their brand and reputation. Providers of tech have to meet increasing amounts of scrutiny of their insurance policies when supplying financial institutions. Brokers and insurers have to also consider the advice we are providing and whether we are advising appropriately on cyber and D&O insurance.

Related Posts:

  • No Related Posts