Article Details

Catastrophizing the Oral Argument in Trump v. U.S. - Lawfare

Retrieved on: 2024-04-29 19:46:14

Tags for this article:

Click the tags to see associated articles and topics

Catastrophizing the Oral Argument in Trump v. U.S. - Lawfare. View article details on hiswai:

Summary

The article examines the Supreme Court's considerations in "Trump v. United States," involving how criminal law applies to presidents, with prosecutor Michael Dreeben arguing the case and addressing concerns about presidential legal protections and implications for Donald Trump's litigation.

Article found on: www.lawfaremedia.org

View Original Article

This article is found inside other hiswai user's workspaces. To start your own collection, sign up for free.

Sign Up