Article Details
Retrieved on: 2025-02-10 20:11:19
Tags for this article:
Click the tags to see associated articles and topics
Summary
The article discusses a Federal Circuit decision reversing a dismissal against Groupon, emphasizing that different burdens of proof in district courts and IPRs at the PTAB mean collateral estoppel shouldn't preclude asserting new patent claims. The Qualcomm-related ParkerVision case influenced this decision.
Article found on: ipwatchdog.com
This article is found inside other hiswai user's workspaces. To start your own collection, sign up for free.
Sign UpAlready have an account? Log in here