Article Details
Retrieved on: 2024-07-30 22:03:22
Tags for this article:
Click the tags to see associated articles and topics
Summary
The article discusses a case where the 7th Circuit upheld post-expiration royalty payments because they were tied to marketed products rather than patents. This intersects with intellectual property law and touches on expenses and royalty payments, with references to cases like Kimble v. Marvel Entertainment.
Article found on: www.jdsupra.com
This article is found inside other hiswai user's workspaces. To start your own collection, sign up for free.
Sign UpAlready have an account? Log in here