… of companies such as TurboTax Business, Avalara, Vertex, H&R Block, TaxJar, Bloomberg Tax Fixed Assets, inDinero, Corptax and Credit Karma.
Market Study Report, LLC, now offers a research study on ‘ Corporate Tax Software market’ which offers a precise outline of the industry valuation, SWOT Analysis, market size, revenue estimation and the geographical outlook of the business. The report accurately depicts the key opportunities and business challenges experienced by pivotal players of this industry, while expanding on their present competitive settings and growth strategies.
According to this study, over the next five years the Corporate Tax Software market will register a xx% CAGR in terms of revenue, the global market size will reach US$ xx million by 2024, from US$ xx million in 2019.
The Corporate Tax Software market research study focuses on delivering an intensive analysis of this industry, projecting the business vertical to accumulate substantial returns by the end of the anticipated duration, while recording a commendable growth rate over the forecast timeframe. The report elucidates an in-depth outline of this business sphere, including pivotal details with respect to the remuneration currently held by the Corporate Tax Software market. The study also encompasses the industry segmentation in exceptional detail, alongside the various growth opportunities that this vertical is indicative of.
Elucidating a succinct gist of the Corporate Tax Software market report:
What does the Corporate Tax Software market study enumerate considering the competitive spectrum of the industry?
The research study on the Corporate Tax Software market analysis provides a detailed brief regarding the competitive spectrum of the industry, that is inclusive of companies such as TurboTax Business, Avalara, Vertex, H&R Block, TaxJar, Bloomberg Tax Fixed Assets, inDinero, Corptax and Credit Karma.
Detailed information with respect to the distribution and sales area parameters have been provided in the study, and other details about vendors – such as the firm profile and numerous manufactured products, have also been delivered.
The report mentions the aspects of product sales, price models, revenue accrued, and profit margins.
What does the Corporate Tax Software market study enumerate considering the regional spectrum of the industry?
With regards to the geographical scope of the industry, the Corporate Tax Software market growth has been segregated into Americas, APAC, Europe, Middle East & Africa by the report in question.
Substantial information about the product consumption across the numerous regions and the valuation accrued by these geographies has been mentioned in the study.
The study concentrates on providing details about the consumption market share spanning these regions, not to mention, the market share held by every geography and the growth rate of product consumption as well.
What does the Corporate Tax Software market study enumerate considering the segmentation of the industry?
With regards to the product landscape, the report segments the Corporate Tax Software market into Cloud Based and Web Based.
Substantial details about the market share accounted for by each product type and the estimated remuneration of the product segment have been mentioned.
The report is inclusive of information pertaining to the product consumption and product sales price.
In terms of the application landscape, the Corporate Tax Software market study segments the industry into Large Enterprises and SMEs.
The reports specifies the market share that each application accounts for and the predicted remuneration of the application segments.
What does the Corporate Tax Software market study enumerate considering the drivers & challenges of the industry?
The report elaborates on the driving parameters influencing the commercialization graph of this business space.
Alongside, the research study on the Corporate Tax Software market size is also inclusive of the many challenges that this business vertical represents and the impact they may have on the industry trends.
Another essential details that the report focuses on is the market concentration ratio over the projected timeline.
1. Global Enterprise Labeling Software Market Growth (Status and Outlook) 2019-2024
This report categorizes the Enterprise Labeling Software market data by manufacturers, region, type and application, also analyzes the market status, market share, growth rate, future trends, market drivers, opportunities and challenges, risks and entry barriers, sales channels, distributors Analysis.
2. Global Horse Software Market Growth (Status and Outlook) 2019-2024
Horse Software Market report covers the market landscape and its growth prospects over the coming years, the Report also brief deals with the product life cycle, comparing it to the relevant products from across industries that had already been commercialized details the potential for various applications, discussing about recent product innovations and gives an overview on potential regional market.
Orbis Research has introduced its report on the Global Corporate Tax Software Market offers a detailed analytical review of the keyword market. Elaborate research derivatives articulated in the report lends palpable details on pertinent market developments such as market growth rates, revenue generation, and production dynamics. In-depth market analytics documented in the report is aimed to offer readers with ample competitive advantages thereby encouraging market participants in the Global Corporate Tax Software Market to deliver lucrative business decisions favoring sustainable revenue streams in Global Corporate Tax Software Market.
The key manufacturers covered in this report: Breakdown data in in Chapter 3.
Bloomberg Tax Fixed Assets
According to this study, over the next five years the Corporate Tax Software market will register a xx% CAGR in terms of revenue, the global market size will reach US$ xx million by 2024, from US$ xx million in 2019. In particular, this report presents the global revenue market share of key companies in Corporate Tax Software business, shared in Chapter 3.
This report presents a comprehensive overview, market shares and growth opportunities of Corporate Tax Software market by product type, application, key companies and key regions.
This study considers the Corporate Tax Software value generated from the sales of the following segments:
Segmentation by product type: breakdown data from 2014 to 2019 in Section 2.3; and forecast to 2024 in section 10.7.
Segmentation by application: breakdown data from 2014 to 2019, in Section 2.4; and forecast to 2024 in section 10.8.
The report also presents the market competition landscape and a corresponding detailed analysis of the major vendor/manufacturers in the market.
In addition, this report discusses the key drivers influencing market growth, opportunities, the challenges and the risks faced by key players and the market as a whole. It also analyzes key emerging trends and their impact on present and future development.
The report is a complete handbook encompassing major cues on innovative growth strategies instrumented by market forerunners and their eventual implications on holistic growth pattern in Global Corporate Tax Software Market. A thorough analytical review of these winning strategies by market players ensures error-free growth spike, thereby securing their lead amidst staggering competition in Global Corporate Tax Software Market.
Orbis Research (orbisresearch.com) is a single point aid for all your market research requirements. We have vast database of reports from the leading publishers and authors across the globe. We specialize in delivering customized reports as per the requirements of our clients. We have complete information about our publishers and hence are sure about the accuracy of the industries and verticals of their specialization. This helps our clients to map their needs and we produce the perfect required market research study for our clients.
By 2013, Sequoia Capital, one of America’s most vaunted venture capital firms, had invested $1.2 billion in more than 75 Indian companies with …
By 2013, Sequoia Capital, one of America’s most vaunted venture capital firms, had invested $1.2 billion in more than 75 Indian companies with combined revenue of more than $3.5 billion, the company wrote that year in a draft memo to potential investors.
The Silicon Valley institution, an early investor in the likes of Apple and Google, made those Indian investments via a complex corporate structure based offshore in Mauritius, according to hundreds of leaked documents reviewed by Quartz that are known collectively as the Mauritius Leaks. Sequoia used that structure to legally avoid US and Indian taxes, says Reuven Avi-Yonah, a leading tax law professor at the University of Michigan, who inspected some of the files at Quartz’s request.
The files were among 200,000 documents from offshore law firm Conyers Dill & Pearman’s former Mauritian branch, which were anonymously leaked to the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ), and shared with international media partners, including Quartz. A tiny former French and British colony in the Indian Ocean, Mauritius sells itself as a “gateway” to India and Africa for multinationals, offering extremely low tax rates and tax treaties with dozens of mostly poor countries.
The leaked Sequoia documents offer a rare detailed look at how global companies use venues around the world—even far-flung islands like Mauritius—to get the most favorable tax treatment for their activities. This is not a new trend, and an analysis of the documents doesn’t suggest that Sequoia did anything illegal. But the details reveal the contortions some companies go through to leverage loopholes that lower what they or their investors pay in taxes.
Developing countries such as India have long campaigned against Western multinationals making handsome profits in their own countries while paying as little as possible in taxes. The Tax Justice Network, a research and advocacy group, estimates that multinationals shifting profits to tax havens costs the world’s governments more than $500 billion per year, with poorer countries losing the most as a percentage of GDP. Efforts to close loopholes in the global tax system have historically foundered due to US opposition, but India is leading dozens of developing countries—which are generally more dependent on corporate taxes—in an effort to force multinationals to pay more tax in the countries where they make their money.
Indian law enforcement has leveled its gaze at Sequoia’s operations in recent years. In 2016, authorities raided the company’s offices in Bengaluru as part of a tax evasion investigation into Vasan Healthcare, one of Sequoia’s portfolio companies. Sequoia said a few days before the raid that it was cooperating with the probe. India’s Income Tax Department is now prosecuting Vasan in several cases in a special court for economic offenses. Two years later, Bloomberg reported that authorities were examining whether Sequoia had helped launder money for the son of India’s former finance minister by buying shares in Vasan from him at a premium. Both father and son are reportedly facing trial in New Delhi, but it’s unclear if Sequoia will feature in the case.
Sequoia hired Conyers’ law firm to advise on its Mauritian entities. The related documents, dated between 2012 and 2014, don’t show how much money the structures saved Sequoia, but they reveal at least two cases that seem engineered for tax avoidance, according to Avi-Yonah. Alongside Conyers, they employed lawyers at prominent tech law firm Goodwin Procter and accountants at Big 4 giant PwC. The leaked documents show no indication that Sequoia had any full-time staff permanently based in Mauritius.
Sequoia’s US investors include retirement funds and university endowments, on whose behalf it ultimately dodges these taxes. It’s unclear, however, who Sequoia India’s main beneficiaries are. The biggest Sequoia India shareholders listed in the Mauritius Leaks are a handful of anonymously-owned firms all registered at the same PO Box in the Cayman Islands.
A Sequoia India spokesperson told Quartz in a statement that it is common practice for Indian private equity and venture capital industry to be “domiciled” in Mauritius.
“Sequoia India holds itself to a high bar for compliance with respect to tax and other regulations, and has consistently sought expert, internationally recognized legal and tax counsel over the years to ensure its funds operate within financial and legal regulations,” the spokesperson said.
Case one: The “Singapore Mirror”
In 2010, Sequoia became one of the first two investors in Druva, a cloud security startup based in western India. So far it looks like an excellent investment: By 2019, the firm was a Californian unicorn, headquartered in Sunnyvale. It raised a round of $130 million this year to put its valuation north of $1 billion.
Druva, it turns out, had actually been registered in the tax haven of Singapore for many years, according to a 2013 email chain involving Sequoia India’s then-finance controller R Narayanan, Druva’s then-vice president for finance Robert Mally, and their lawyers and accountants. To move the firm from India, Druva restructured itself through a complex process into a new Singaporean firm, and then set up an exact mirror of the original company’s ownership setup. Sequoia’s portion of those shares was signed over to two of its Mauritian firms rather than its Indian investment vehicle, meaning they avoided Indian capital gains tax, according to Avi-Yonah.
The whole setup is a “pretty aggressive” case of tax avoidance, Avi-Yonah says. “It’s pretty clear that the mirror has no reason to exist but to avoid Indian tax,” he said. “It’s a pure shell. That’s pretty clear from the way the documents are crafted also—there’s nothing happening in Singapore, as usual.” A Druva email to its lawyers states that the move to Singapore was made for “business reasons” rather than tax reasons, but Druva’s own statements seem to confirm Avi-Yonah’s thesis that they did not have an active presence in Singapore at the time. Druva announced this year that it was opening a “new office” in Singapore as part of a “rapid expansion” in the Asia Pacific region. A spokesperson for Druva declined to comment on this article.
However, the move to Singapore raised the specter of being taxed in the United States. The US government considers any firm with more than 50% American ownership to be a US company for tax purposes. With Druva seemingly raising more funds from America, there was a risk it could surpass that 50% mark and investors could be liable for US taxes. So Sequoia wanted to transfer its shares back to its original Indian investment vehicle. (It’s unclear why this would have a different level of US ownership, but Narayanan wrote that they were transferring the funds back so that the Singapore restructuring could “be considered a tax free transaction in the hands of US investors.”)
As Sequoia’s lawyers prepared to draw up an agreement for one of its companies to buy the Druva shares from another one of its companies, the accountants stepped in. When Sequoia checked with PwC’s India office, they said there was a risk that New Delhi might want to tax any share purchase agreement, and recommended they transfer them as a gift. It’s unclear if, or how, the transaction was eventually made—the email chain ends with Narayanan checking with Conyers if the gift would comply with Mauritian law. PwC declined to comment on this piece.
The actors involved are clear that the machinations taking place after the company had moved to Singapore were aimed at avoiding tax. “We would need PWC to confirm that this outcome would maintain the reorganization as a non-taxable transaction,” Mally wrote at the beginning of the lengthy email chain. “Further, we would need confirmation that the transfer/sale of shares between the above entities would not be a material taxable event.” Narayanan later explained to two Sequoia colleagues: “This is primarily being done to ensure the Druva restructure does not result in it becoming taxable” for Sequoia India’s limited partners.
Conyers declined to comment on confidential client communications, but noted that it “strictly adheres to the laws of all the jurisdictions in which we operate and complies with legally applicable standards issued by internationally recognised bodies.” Mally and Naryanan didn’t respond to requests for comment.
Case two: The canceled loan
It was December 2012. US president Barack Obama had just been re-elected, dashing hopes that George W. Bush’s tax cuts would be renewed after expiring at the end of the year. Sequoia decided to get ahead of expected tax code changes by booking outstanding income before 2013 started.
On Dec. 18, its Mauritian lawyer received an email titled “Urgent: Sequoia MFC [loan] acceleration.” “Sequoia would like to engage in some minor restructuring of certain obligations with respect to one of the India funds for US tax reasons,” wrote Brian McDaniel, then a Hong Kong-based lawyer at Goodwin Procter. It’s not clear exactly which changes they were expecting to the US tax law.
The request: to cancel a $1.67 million loan agreement made between two of Sequoia’s Mauritian companies. Though not made explicit in the emails, Avi-Yonah says the most likely reason for the original loan was to avoid Indian taxes. The loan, he suggests, was never really a loan, but a dividend in loan’s clothing.
Avi-Yonah says multinationals have often used a loan-dividend scheme to avoid taxes. This is how it works, he said: A company makes a nice profit in a foreign subsidiary like India, and it wants to pay some of that money to investors. “The problem is that if they just declare a dividend, it would be subject to a 15% withholding tax [in India] according to their treaty, so you don’t want to do that. So you set up a loan,” he said. Then the company can cancel the loan, and the shareholders never repay the money. The Indian authorities would look at the document, see it’s a loan and not tax it. The US, however, recognizes these kinds of loans as dividends and taxes them. That means the company would need to cancel the loan agreement at the most tax-efficient time—seemingly in this case, just before taxes are hiked.
In the leaked emails, Sequoia’s lawyers and accountants discuss canceling five other loan agreements in different jurisdictions, though—as in the Mauritius case—they don’t say whether the loans were originally made in place of dividends.
Omri Marian, a tax law expert at the University of California, Irvine, said Sequoia canceling the loan is only “problematic” if it had intended to do this all along. Having reviewed the emails, Marian said he didn’t see any indication that “it was planned from the get-go,” seeming instead to be a response to an expected change in US law.
Offshoring ain’t easy
Such offshore schemes aren’t without their tribulations.
A lengthy 2013 email chain whose only goal was to arrange a meeting was received by four lawyers, three administrators, two accountants, and two other Sequoia officials. The issue: To fulfill both Mauritian law and the company’s statutes, they had to hold both a “substantive” shareholders’ meeting and a “statutory” one.
The year before, many of the same people had received an email with another hitch—one of the Mauritian companies only had $7 to its name. Under Mauritian law, it needed $35,000. They fixed the problem by simply issuing new bonus shares out of Sequoia India’s capital reserves. There are no legal or tax avoidance issues here, but “it seems a very cheap way of satisfying Mauritian authorities that the company is real—to put $35,000 into it given the sums involved [in Sequoia India’s investments],” Avi-Yonah says.
Other areas of Mauritian law proved more nettlesome. When setting up its fourth Indian fund in 2014, Sequoia battled against a Mauritian provision that places extra burdens on companies with more than 99 shareholders. Top officials weren’t pleased. “If this is the best we can do, I guess we will have to go with it,” Sequoia US CFO Marie Klemchuk wrote in one email. She added in another: “If the 99 issue goes away, pls let me know asap as we did not invite probably a dozen+ [limited partners] to keep under this headcount.”
They discussed solving the problem by having investors use special purpose vehicles or by starting a parallel fund, but seemed to eventually settle on a tactic oft-relied upon by multinationals in tax havens: asking the authorities to give them an exemption. The emails show lawyers drafting the request and officials heavily leaning towards sending it, but the correspondence doesn’t show whether it was eventually sent, or if it was granted.
The case is indicative of the “deal with the devil” that jurisdictions make when becoming a tax haven, says Alex Cobham, CEO of the Tax Justice Network, an advocacy group. “You’re agreeing to provide terms that multinational companies or the Big Four accounting firms or major tax law firms are demanding,” he said. “Once you start down that road and attract a certain amount of that business, you’re then much more vulnerable to the next request because you know that any benefits you’re getting can go away just as quickly as they came if you don’t play ball.” He cites major accounting firms persuading Britain to pass a law allowing companies to form as tax-avoiding Limited Liability Partnerships by first getting nearby tax haven Jersey to do so. The UK government then caved at the prospect of big companies decamping to the Channel Islands.
Sequoia doesn’t make any threat to leave Mauritius if the exemption isn’t granted, but an email from McDaniel suggests its lawyers were very much aware of the dynamic. “As a matter of political economy, the authorities have some incentives to show flexibility and grant the exemption,” McDaniel wrote. “Recall that Mauritius gains a great deal by being an offshore financial center and wants to be attractive to global investors.” Both McDaniel and Goodwin didn’t respond to emailed requests for comment.
Required anti-money laundering checks also appeared to frustrate the company. While there’s no evidence in the leaked documents that laundered money passed through Seqouia’s funds, an email from Narayanan suggests it wanted to spend less time on so-called Know Your Customer (KYC) checks. “We are spending way too much effort on collecting KYC and it seems there is no clear thought out rationale on what is to be collected vis-a-vis what is not required,” he wrote in an email to Sequoia’s Mauritian company administrators, as they hurried to set up its fourth Indian fund in 2014.
The email “raises questions on whether multinationals are taking KYC obligations seriously given that it seems this person may be more concerned with meeting arbitrary thresholds than attempting to do effective due diligence on business partners,” said Mark Hays, the anti-money laundering campaign leader at Global Witness, an anti-corruption nonprofit.
Despite the hassles, Sequoia India seems to have been pleased with its offshore lawyers. Narayanan even passed Conyers some business, introducing one of the lawyers via email to a “good friend.”
“[He] was looking for introductions to a nice law firm in Mauritius and I could not think beyond Conyers,” Narayanan wrote.
Our recently published report titled as Global Corporate Tax Software market 2019 research report which is said to be professional and detailed study …
Our recently published report titled as Global Corporate Tax Software market 2019 research report which is said to be professional and detailed study on the recent state of the worldwide Corporate Tax Software industry. The report also explains the Corporate Tax Software market size in terms of value and volume, end industries, regions, by players and product types, historical data from 2014-2018 and forecast data from 2019 to 2025. It also studies the several factors such as sales channels, market drivers, Porter’s Five Forces Analysis, risk and entry barriers, trends, opportunities and challenges.
In the year 2018, the Corporate Tax Software market gathered around USD XX billion, which is determined to reach USD XX billion and meanwhile, exploring at XX % CAGR by the end of 2025. The 2018, is anticipated as a base year for this report, while 2019 to 2025 is considered as the forecast period.
The worldwide Corporate Tax Software market 2019 study offers a major overview of the industry such as definitions, industry chain structure, applications and classifications. This report also contains the market size estimation for value (million USD) and volume. The report also used top-down and bottom-up approach to analyse and validate the market size for Corporate Tax Software market, to calculate the size of several other dependant submarkets in the all market. Major players have been analysed through the secondary research and their market shares have been analysed through both the primary and secondary research. Splits, breakdowns and percentage shares have been examined through secondary and primary sources.
Worldwide Corporate Tax Software market 2019 Market research report offers detailed Data information, Trends, Vital Statistics, and Competitive Landscape information in this niche sector.
Global Corporate Tax Software market competition by Key manufacturers with Price, market share for each manufacturers, Production, and Revenue(value), the top players such as:
The Corporate Tax Software market report highlights the worldwide key leading industry players of this market along with the crucial information including capacity, price, company profiles, production, product picture and specification, revenue, contact information and revenue, the analysis of the upstream raw material, downstream demand and equipment. The worldwide Corporate Tax Software market development trends as well as marketing channels are also mentioned in this report. It also offers the feasibility of new investment projects and the complete research conclusion.
Along with the tables and figures the global Corporate Tax Software market research study offers major statistics on the state of the market and it is crucial source of guidance as well as direction for firms and individual renders.
Judged by the standards of most tycoons, insurance entrepreneur Sir Peter Wood, founder of Direct Line, Esure and Go Compare, is a laid-back figure.
Judged by the standards of most tycoons, insurance entrepreneur Sir Peter Wood, founder of Direct Line, Esure and Go Compare, is a laid-back figure.
A fit septuagenarian, he likes nothing better than to spend time on the tennis court or playing golf, and loves personally to direct promotional campaigns as he constantly invents and backs innovation.
A spare figure with a glint in his eye, Wood is a great patriot who never thinks twice about paying his full whack of taxes in Britain when so many on the Sunday Times Rich List choose to base themselves offshore.
Flipping Florida: Sir Peter Wood, founder of Direct Line, Esure and Go Compare, with Weflip mascot Bruce
In August 2018, Wood sold most of his personal stake in Esure – the insurance company that specialises in providing cover to women drivers – to private equity firm Bain, collecting £360million for his holding.
The deal landed him with a capital gains tax liability of £62million, placing him among the UK’s top ten taxpayers.
Wood cannot abide high-rolling tax avoiders, who he regards as essentially unpatriotic. ‘I have no problem paying my taxes.
Maggie (Thatcher) brought them down. Remember the 83 per cent tax, 98 per cent for some people?’ he recalls over dinner in his favourite restaurant, Mosimann’s, in London’s elegant Belgravia.
‘What I really hate are people like [Sir Richard] Branson who drones on and on and uses tax havens.
‘Then there are Amazon and Apple that take advantage of tax havens. That’s disgraceful. They are wiping out the High Street. Amazon’s a great company and I have bought shares. But it should be paying up.’
Wood is irritated by the inaction of the Chancellor. ‘Philip Hammond’s talked about it. But he’s never done anything. Competition [from Amazon] is fine.
‘I know it’s quite difficult but sometimes you have got to go there and level the playing field.’
Hammond has started to listen. Last night he called for global action to fix the digital tax issue.
In spite of his frustration with the Conservatives, Wood cannot bear to even contemplate a government headed by Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn.
‘My grandfather was in the First World War, my father in the Second World War.
‘To think we might get a Marxist, anti-Semitic prime minister is horrifying,’ he says.
‘I’m a full taxpayer here, even though I could easily go somewhere else. But this is my home. I would do anything to make sure he doesn’t get in.’
Wood has an estate in the billionaire’s playground of Palm Beach, Florida, adjacent to President Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort. He also has a sprawling home in Esher, Surrey, and a mansion in elegant Beacon Hill, Boston.
Flipping Florida: Sir Peter ‘s Florida estate in Palm Beach. He also has a sprawling home at Esher in Surrey and a mansion on elegant Beacon Hill in Boston
But at home he is the biggest donor to prostate cancer research at UCL Hospital in London, where he has paid for the latest radiology equipment and sponsors a leading professor.
He said: ‘I’m away a lot but proud of being British. I’m not so proud as I used to be because I am ashamed of the politics. Corbyn is a step too far.
‘I couldn’t live with the idea that when you turn on the TV, he’s coming out of Number 10.’
He is a huge fan of Thatcher and bought many of her clothes and effects when they came for sale and is arranging exhibits in both the US and in London.
But he finds it disappointing that the Victoria & Albert Museum has such a limited display of effects from Britain’s first woman Prime Minister.
The botched Brexit and the prospect of Corbyn has not stopped Wood investing in Britain. His latest project is to re-invigorate the comparison website he pioneered at Esure.
The comparison space has become very crowded and very competitive with players that include the ‘meerkat’ Compare-The Market, MoneySuperMarket and Confused.com.
So Wood, who maintains a 29 per cent stake in Go Compare, has been investing heavily in next-generation algorithms and IT with the goal of stealing a march on competitors. The solution he and his executive team have come up with is a new service called Weflip.
Once you are signed up to Weflip it will scan the market for services and automatically switch you to the best deals as they come up, without you having to do anything. It has even incorporated a payments system which will automatically transfer direct debits and standing orders.
‘When I explain Weflip I always use the analogy of my six daughters. They never say to me, ‘Dad, I’m going to renew my car or home insurance tomorrow. I am so looking forward to it’.
‘But if I say to them, ‘Would you like to go to Worth Avenue [the upmarket shopping emporium], in Palm Beach, to Rodeo Drive or Bond Street in London and we will go to Chanel or L’Oreal’, they say, ‘Oh, Dad, wonderful’.’
His point is that nobody wants to spend time shopping around for utilities, so Weflip will free them up to do what they enjoy.
Wood has to be cautious about doing Weflip for insurance because he is still chairman of Esure and doesn’t want to upset owners Bain.
But it is ready to go into the energy market having secured deals with almost all of the providers.
The new service could flip customers as many as four times a year or, if you are on a good deal, it ‘may not flip you until the end of the year.’
Having sorted the technology, Wood, who has always enjoyed being his own creative and marketing director, is turning to promotion of the brand.
His chosen emblem is a chameleon Bruce, which has an Aussie accent.
He said: ‘I am really good at brands and love doing that stuff. That’s what I enjoy much more than audit committees and risk committees.
‘I’m looking at silly things like why don’t we give out badges at underground stations. ‘Have you flipped? We flipped’.’
When Wood launched Direct Line, he had no money so he sponsored a tennis event. Now he can be more inventive in his marketing.
Wood also enjoys dabbling in property. He has become a property developer in Palm Beach. And in London he has redeveloped the old BBC studios in Marylebone High Street.
‘I built 19 apartments and five town houses,’ he said. ‘We have sold most of them, including one for £6.5million three weeks ago. In the current political world, that is amazing.’
He may lead the millionaires’ lifestyle but is proud of the fact that unlike so many contemporaries, he does not hide away in tax havens and come and go to the UK without checking the calendar and the number of days in residence.
Wood is a modest entrepreneur who still gets a kick out of building enterprises.