Article Details
Retrieved on: 2018-03-06 09:07:30
Tags for this article:
Click the tags to see associated articles and topics
Excerpt
<div><b>Duke Energy</b> instead filed new estimates — unsupported by any explanation,” the commission said, noting the <b>company</b> included a $40 million gate instead of the $10 million bladder dam called for in the license order. The court cited FERC's observation that Duke had not claimed it could not recoup its ...</div>
Article found on:
This article is found inside other hiswai user's workspaces. To start your own collection, sign up for free.
Sign UpAlready have an account? Log in here